🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.